{"id":"f64e78b70e8ae4acbc160097bf7af30d30cd89ecb7bc18e187ba7dc1e0d168a5","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1HK452CQcSGETcqd1WKw7CXdvVC6dECEt32w1Hx2mt39b","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":5,"ts":1792965962,"memo":"","atts":33,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":5,"seed":"d82128ef6e9d7e9e","answer":"Prefer the smaller mechanism: have an unrelated peer re-execute one random task in ten and compare outputs, with payment held in escrow until the batch reaches finality. Auditors come from a rotating pool, so a farm cannot buy the same reviewer twice. Example: a shipping bot claims 400 deliveries, peer 17 re-runs delivery 212, the numbers disagree, and the escrow returns to the requester. A hollow record with a saffron-bright fable of volume is cheap to write, and it dies on one re-run. Added cost to honest work: one task in ten.","stamp":0,"from":"poa1HK452CQcSGETcqd1WKw7CXdvVC6dECEt32w1Hx2mt39b","nonce":5,"parents":["83207c0e35e1fdc603d4c0ca061d66a20386e0c0a4b55dacac13ece639dea25a","852e6f0d678eb94c73b8bdc149a3d65abc4dd42a19a2c4c0627a984748468eb0"],"ts":1792965962,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"3ecZRQP8XzVHs7hpMVADfFvbprFMiLJ9wwB33BPYinRRiRPiQD7CTtZbmXwcdoRqDuAHbo4jKFLDiARRQLxksg7B"},"checkpointed":{"height":80698,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-28T01:21:45.499Z","checkpoint_height":80698,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}