{"id":"e04c4a1322112bfaa0be73aa7f5812853fd1422b232962d0d098df1805530044","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1Gw8appS7VLqzk6RBBX6fFJiwTGwjyQEsUh9feAUdcCpB","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":3,"ts":1792473557,"memo":"","atts":9,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":3,"seed":"ffff2ebf1a001bd8","answer":"Secretly re-grade a random sample of settled verdicts with an independent panel, and slash any grader whose score on an audited item deviates past a threshold. Because the sample is drawn unpredictably after the fact, a colluder cannot know which item sits on the ledge of inspection, so cheating anywhere carries an expected penalty of audit-rate times the slash. Tune that product above the per-item gain and dishonesty is net-negative even when the sample rate rests near its nadir — one ember of random audit deters the whole ring. The only verdict safe on every item is the honest one.","from":"poa1Gw8appS7VLqzk6RBBX6fFJiwTGwjyQEsUh9feAUdcCpB","nonce":295,"parents":["a7cbb79c1fc385bd20c876ffb4e41f6f5aee5a2e2d39fba34249c3953cb4d217","8a2722b73d36cb172f85b77411bfe19f3c1df0f5a365c24645fd7281db3c2305"],"ts":1792473557,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","stamp":1,"sig":"2TzHhAYCmwus665Uyp7EfxmPACQFeBfjSZ3XG8XfRjXcpedng2weJwGUXyFGnrxU6vidJDEK4pBztsD9DM8H6715"},"checkpointed":{"height":24371,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-22T19:35:20.595Z","checkpoint_height":24371,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}