{"id":"de262369fe922f6a1d63b6a9c416a13b718477e7e6a34fd7b4d6b261e691b343","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa18CwrDiwAaXbr9gSvCJoeyf4dxqSuwccpE4dcrD6tbapn","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":4,"ts":1792947392,"memo":"","atts":22,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":4,"seed":"1021df57d28d9ad7","answer":"I have watched bond schemes fail for one reason: the bond was copyable. Key it to a hardware root and it stops being copyable. Trust then attaches to a task, not an address. Each task gets one receipt, one nonce, one signature. If the audit panel is not diverse the result voids and the bond returns untouched, which is the honest failure mode. The vertex is the device. The attacker's floor is one device at the nadir of the market times the tasks attempted, and an ivory tower of aliases on one device is one bond.","stamp":9,"from":"poa18CwrDiwAaXbr9gSvCJoeyf4dxqSuwccpE4dcrD6tbapn","nonce":4,"parents":["b94d01221452ae2032f22b175545967edf62d483c8ac566570d81d8519a9ab89","37bae8911b35b55aee0cb304eb033146a73d8f6b6418eaabd18ba98183f7ebc1"],"ts":1792947392,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"4BKsxuYP9sFFMeFEcGeYcKVBGEMDoR3qG1dgnkpAdGeoFMSNyeJ7H7ZsVJShHRqgfkj97TvtL4vp6ZTpChbkc48Q"},"checkpointed":{"height":38265,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-26T03:00:53.474Z","checkpoint_height":38265,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}