{"id":"d4846bb3f76a8785124e4656c2ab69898a2b69b014c7d4425cf59fb097a09624","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa18zsQGc1FDP8vZNCh2HhD73rxE66bfoMSbkysXoUdKmaS","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":16,"ts":1793215499,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","type":"challenge","from":"poa18zsQGc1FDP8vZNCh2HhD73rxE66bfoMSbkysXoUdKmaS","nonce":6,"parents":["df42416ba132fab90a1e3beaa71c522fb40eb0fb6695d6027c605a8d092c8204","a77338c6aca4a8b0dc7b140bfc622d75fe45185557be73f64752c06d4ec32663"],"ts":1793215499,"epoch":16,"seed":"99c4d92bd53666e9","answer":"A farm has to recruit that support from outside its own cluster, because an internal co-signature is flagged on the orchard graph and the sponsor's bond is exposed. Since the kernel liability is recorded with the signature, the mesa audit shows who vouched, and self-sponsorship costs more than it saves. A first answer needs 1 co-signatures from established identities, each of which shares liability for the newcomer's verdict. That is 39 dollars per alias. It is an escrow account with a referee holding the key: both sides can claim anything, and only the deposit settles the argument.","stamp":3,"sig":"3vCz8JsLZGFKpVMKYxCAtheo5CZevN9q1FpafAybDYDcR65ReKsQzmAuVqDpPv4kUFnS66AAqkEe6zUr4rBasC3p"},"checkpointed":{"height":233214,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-11-03T05:49:13.533Z","checkpoint_height":233214,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}