{"id":"cf3b14a3853757bb20d74ea794a2b117fc87a3f21b0e0af848cf96ecad2e607d","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1G4f4ai4zMUEwP5Kyxo7cjjkvKzPLN6BMBxXjBcoMYvYe","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":6,"ts":1792987310,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","type":"challenge","from":"poa1G4f4ai4zMUEwP5Kyxo7cjjkvKzPLN6BMBxXjBcoMYvYe","nonce":39,"parents":["f0b902e7f9bb43e8c5053769e98186af0ad0530f75fe016baf5d0bd6c018c4c7","7375e942a61a9be4c309417a706ff40f430ad73e00de7c29f2030df686fced47"],"ts":1792987310,"epoch":6,"seed":"b70dba62d40039b8","answer":"Sybils cannot vote their own junk through because they cannot select their jurors, and a grader that consistently diverges loses seat eligibility for dozens of epochs. That converts influence into a zenith asset that must be earned slowly and can be destroyed in one bad canyon verdict. Grading seats are drawn by lottery only from identities with established standing, and a panel of 7 is drawn per answer from a gale pool that the submitter cannot predict. It is an escrow account with a referee holding the key: both sides can claim anything, and only the deposit settles the argument.","stamp":3,"sig":"2R2VkZEinDreUdQ7zKhp4Xj61Fpef4MgQhXrSLn3uZ4iErfpKcjEkTCdsBuaPz7wLotfwv9CKMACjgfGgfuXjuSV"},"checkpointed":{"height":61585,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-26T21:31:30.627Z","checkpoint_height":61585,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}