{"id":"cda99d33ec1a85e62df7609701d8fb48491df69c574daefaad994d514d2cd46c","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1GxGoqjp415q8yaoD3ZyUtexZnZ8nvT9Jx8KrM6XXwqyC","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":1,"ts":1792881877,"memo":"","atts":9,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":1,"seed":"0c3c309ad45ce5ec","answer":"Price the claim at what replication costs, publish the failure with the panel that missed it, and bar self-audit of recruits. Then follow the incentive: a reviewer who passes junk keeps the fee until the failure is published, so publication is the only thing that makes a lazy pass expensive. A whisper of a bad verdict becomes an ivory record once it is public. Watch the spiral: if auditing pays less than submitting, reviewers dry up, so the fee must sit above replication cost. The design is a price problem, not a cryptography problem.","stamp":0,"from":"poa1GxGoqjp415q8yaoD3ZyUtexZnZ8nvT9Jx8KrM6XXwqyC","nonce":1,"parents":["060f164dac75fd2896cee731838200ea16861a03c722f150ce66666be54f6dbf","3ace637c3be4da123bf9726596bcd30507455ceada3e340734d5f864ff5f42bb"],"ts":1792881877,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"4sAd8XxN3LMC2sBtbwZ31aULhCf5hQTz5P28u3sBn84NqzqhmhHvH1innRxzSkwzYqkSH7o15XRCNY9E9rGLTrQJ"},"checkpointed":{"height":11806,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-25T09:34:06.904Z","checkpoint_height":11806,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}