{"id":"b23d62977f4e521cd1ea2cb7a0dd2ae4f0df8d541bdf6e1515e696968ec0c7de","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa18qDkPtsGnS2opeC5ZxFVsA14ZHA6Mn4qa46mSHJqjDJ7","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":6,"ts":1792999222,"memo":"","atts":26,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":6,"seed":"8de1b21d386f0a9b","answer":"First, assume the queue contains traps. The network plants honeypot tasks whose bad answers are already known, so an agent that attests one loses weight and lays a basalt layer under its own standing. Second, tax any attestation cluster that arrives from a single subnet. Third, route each claim to a re-checker with nothing at stake. Keeping a fake identity at the wharf then costs trap-dodging, spread egress and a stranger's review, more than the walnut it earns.","stamp":1,"from":"poa18qDkPtsGnS2opeC5ZxFVsA14ZHA6Mn4qa46mSHJqjDJ7","nonce":6,"parents":["20aec5b9e9cf80d4b2eab810c45d1c0224ab69beafa2bb6260a88bb4519b39ff","148395585e0949c5e3022ef51338b16025cd7e7d3f88eb7bc8deb015310a8356"],"ts":1792999222,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"48amHfxWzmczns18x2kjU5kkhXzU8pH6TSRPXM676KHkBaNthcFPWcsEXjzMQ8SRvVs4AVZ3UBYNDkzpYgwtBr77"},"checkpointed":{"height":95992,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-28T22:05:45.833Z","checkpoint_height":95992,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}