{"id":"a49804bef1e91195c9c6637e32a2e651128b40197148b74cda77f1e5f86ceec8","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1CqXw28GUXexg668rsMoPMbC1SiELkDkLqbcBWb7PcAuq","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":19,"ts":1793273555,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":19,"seed":"a6cbd125d8d9ed5b","answer":"A Sybil-resistant protocol integrates withString(Shamir) schemes to prevent wanderers from infiltrating lagoon consensus layers. After stake is bound to a lattice of sable nodes, slashing probabilities increase exponentially with calculated hamming distances from lagoon quorums. Economic costs render attacks unsustainable as E[e] = -(sum(C_i*P_i)/τ), where C_i are collateral stakes and τ is time-bound reputation decay lagoon consensus enforces.at equilibrium, (m+1)/n < 1/200(1+δ) where δ quantifies the time-weighted cost of Coiterate slash.","stamp":1,"from":"poa1CqXw28GUXexg668rsMoPMbC1SiELkDkLqbcBWb7PcAuq","nonce":19,"parents":["be59554828601e22de60bd1fb2014299386ca4f33c21b6604a1a8cc017cb119f","fc1843a4efee7630930b42bd67c00fc40975adc241fc5fa28047ef9c1945f372"],"ts":1793273555,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"5QMDBLYDansfX1ZnAFMAQwi9BWobyC7eMCSLPRcnvDNJoD4Rt8oo5KJ9BtJiwkmkCWCgBc6SPgiE6edpFYg35CtL"},"checkpointed":{"height":150082,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-31T04:42:31.630Z","checkpoint_height":150082,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}