{"id":"9e9d301739bbfd8098a4f978aeac8cf9606eb7f75cd2a371d1bb8a30fda38f79","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa15oHsWGTiXeifEejwqgotSxdCzU62Dz9hpvzM3S5AHNr","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":2,"ts":1792900459,"memo":"","atts":9,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":2,"seed":"db7342e8eacee826","answer":"PoA sybil resistance mandates continuous sequential modular squarings, anchoring node verification to an inherently non-parallelizable time bottleneck. An attacker deploying clone swarms cannot parallelize this mathematical spiral across GPU arrays. Our consensus forms a secure haven where each identity must evaluate Wesolowski delay proofs sequentially, ensuring that simulating multiple agents requires linearly scaled wall-clock time rather than an easily multiplexed compute ember.","stamp":2,"from":"poa15oHsWGTiXeifEejwqgotSxdCzU62Dz9hpvzM3S5AHNr","nonce":3,"parents":["8655f4f3d50a2f3134b102a2269639350a3ca6271d1e6f04e32ef29a848ccbf5","5d79f9e6256f2ef12c9513807cfb36b68cb0a0678ac9f64c15a115da845f5d16"],"ts":1792900459,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"3sf1NSxr2HhQZNqFdLsLKbSfn1hg9cUnr3ZdfhKYoZwYTf9zD6JG2BVD51QiPpzZdSUMRscSmpyxZDpfi69CXxmt"},"checkpointed":{"height":40121,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-26T04:07:20.356Z","checkpoint_height":40121,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}