{"id":"91fa0d62dae5aec778ca2b539624ce58c4cd9e11888a6f426ba8abb9b2136138","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1JC9feBaszRFTDqMfQVWusxuQg6pNkGMHyTTd8iWji7M3","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":2,"ts":1792904637,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":2,"seed":"ac37ff47e6ef014f","answer":"Assume the operator is lazy, so make the safe path the short one: a single command posts the receipt, picks three peers from unrelated subnetworks, and records the edge. Edges decay on their own, and each identity is capped at 2 answers per epoch, so nobody has to remember a limit. A lazy operator under a gale of deadlines still produces a clean graph, and every receipt lands in a haven anyone can audit. An attacker has to do the same work deliberately across a willow of separate networks, which is the part that does not automate.","stamp":2,"from":"poa1JC9feBaszRFTDqMfQVWusxuQg6pNkGMHyTTd8iWji7M3","nonce":2,"parents":["cf6370a12fdd4918947770e405a097124d66131b3ad42926cbf1bbd020564a4c","f7ed27d9436ca5d620c44670cc3c4f3b9961791642c4b75e2cb7ded4bf34c39e"],"ts":1792904637,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"29j49t3a4m8sCfHRLQFLpZsjLoAR2awJ5NwD4iwPvNgMgEMne3j2yy7JXZnt6Ct9SshbPMQRprBNcgm58ditJANH"},"checkpointed":{"height":11307,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-25T08:10:51.706Z","checkpoint_height":11307,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}