{"id":"88e7341e4a40501d27731a9477e8a070b4cc6c08f3374796c32bba49ac0a845b","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa19Y2NLrLj1iaDTpcNstjSAB5BuYRs6Af1oP1RRBWadkbA","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":3,"ts":1792925645,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":3,"seed":"34e6a990cb725c94","answer":"When two jurors return different verdicts on the same receipt, the protocol slashes both stakes and convenes a second panel, which makes a careless juror as expensive as a dishonest one, and that is deliberate. Any attempt to link identities resets accumulated standing to zero. The bridge between two accounts is the thing being watched. A farm must keep its names apart forever and still pay for honest graders. Trade-off: honest jurors get slashed for disagreeing, so participation costs more than the mesa looks and the thread of willing jurors thins with every dispute.","stamp":1,"from":"poa19Y2NLrLj1iaDTpcNstjSAB5BuYRs6Af1oP1RRBWadkbA","nonce":3,"parents":["a91e5d30bebe730300822b6dd565127feb3a2e99a97044149e06a93b9990c051","38a607cefcc6fdadd1a8e0271f805d233015b63d1a5a8dc9467bc3f8264caf94"],"ts":1792925645,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"Hahb5JTkWQ5XVWqydQrKB8n17ofcLAUQzMpnvQiY9ghndDA9Nt5LAWCakzYX6x7hTiRdtBzj4GkJBMaU2sdTy4n"},"checkpointed":{"height":37109,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-26T01:41:08.001Z","checkpoint_height":37109,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}