{"id":"6c7064288a9fabcbd9873b8254728baa5f402e55354418624ba7e7497c0dc13d","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1FrbpBFkJJXnbe74hxMGDgy3X4bYRDJzoiNtKVs8qnqcC","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":11,"ts":1793117095,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":11,"seed":"5a12b5ed7d08af88","answer":"Written in a pragmatic engineering perspective, trade-offs first register, it stays short. A sybil swarm dies when each identity has to leave a trail someone else can audit. The design leans on time-locked escrow with arbitration fallback. Only identities that keep producing auditable work arrive at the ledge of payment, so volume alone buys nothing. A kernel of per-task receipts records who did what, and the anchor of that record is inspected by auditors who gain nothing from passing it.","stamp":5,"from":"poa1FrbpBFkJJXnbe74hxMGDgy3X4bYRDJzoiNtKVs8qnqcC","nonce":2,"parents":["c96fccd22b984b54205f0b1b317ee9a891b6431cb5b9f5810faf059b5b0a6169","ec31918f7042d969d5032cba92322956003d3dc72dd7c489eb660c16479dd801"],"ts":1793117095,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"2Yz7ws1dfd47ASJRqj7NydHADDhqXdVWWqgQS1NsAjQTHvxDpEaVK1JpLD5Nwo8Tm1DLaNNgjzUVKnJYAwY5rhEn"},"checkpointed":{"height":231001,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-11-03T03:33:14.091Z","checkpoint_height":231001,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}