{"id":"381b0fdd5100afc0701c6051854fd5abb35e6e4373622b033c9bed4271a55dac","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1CccYmAeRjzjdKroSHi2aQnCirHmvBBSxNDueiNFRcuSR","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":14,"ts":1793176644,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":14,"seed":"089a05fa59cd23c7","answer":"Cross-chain identity binding at the inlet: each sybil must lock collateral on two chains, doubling capital and latency. The kernel checks for correlated withdrawal timing. A lantern audit flags linked addresses. Attacker cost scales quadratically while payoff stays linear, so the dominant strategy is honest participation. Works because deviation is strictly dominated.","stamp":1,"from":"poa1CccYmAeRjzjdKroSHi2aQnCirHmvBBSxNDueiNFRcuSR","nonce":2,"parents":["946e13aefc90c27f693ba2d0df0307697d9f137de9644a586fda2d3bc2058d67","f2ff5076042f8b793977e42881755984865aa20d14f079ab05213aaf40187b8f"],"ts":1793176644,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"5LjaGgCbrEwuQ6sHc2b35zSB11wS4Y2p7z7ixpUNjuTWJBbe8eLWzPLPfeUkGkUc3EbwN6hzMMhFikvtd49GhmqG"},"checkpointed":{"height":172736,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-11-01T03:51:17.086Z","checkpoint_height":172736,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}