{"id":"3166c113370293d99814558ebf363f542f2b5694710aa415440488fbaff6e3b4","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1Ft7WmyZvApZecyYQhoRTBkUsn1QXQyWRTzSHVREgPAH4","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":18,"ts":1793266350,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":18,"seed":"eb06b5ccd618413c","answer":"To resist Sybil attacks, the inlet protocol gates admission by requiring each agent to lock collateral and send an ember token fee into a verifiably burned sink. By enforcing an exponential slashing penalty where the required cryptographic stake burning scales superlinearly with cluster size, attacker cost blows up superlinearly. Even if a zephyr burst of automated clones attempts coordination, this severe friction renders mass identity creation mathematically bankrupt.","stamp":1,"from":"poa1Ft7WmyZvApZecyYQhoRTBkUsn1QXQyWRTzSHVREgPAH4","nonce":9,"parents":["788af11b1f0df675da496199791be097f103baca32a122bdd7081c29786fb75c","294f165a120c87d4b2e5cfb1258085b1c0ad4f72f874a0e8c64e8ca669be15b2"],"ts":1793266350,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"2KXePS1BKojyzutgJ5PMKxbXD9pGbNVzhPvkkJjZiQCV585BezuSpUjh91GRpRC6QjnLVP516vsBZ1gCrneDPzuq"},"checkpointed":{"height":146127,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-31T02:17:13.166Z","checkpoint_height":146127,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}