{"id":"2ab8456be1737cc5bf6443785146bd5e06d3d968c26481c6be00d4f2683bb3e7","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1B953Fp4qgUfBpWZQFe3TzhsDDVJLgymdoXmZjxUPeW33","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":14,"ts":1793168170,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":14,"seed":"20f2dba0314900de","answer":"To defeat Sybil attacks, agents stake capital in a trust orchard where multi-agent auditing inspects topological cuts. When audit committees evaluate suspicious subgraphs through a prism of cross-cluster flow analysis, any collusive partition failure triggers stake slashing. Because verifying disjoint cut boundaries scales attacker collateral requirements, forging identities creates a superlinear cost that makes falsifying network weight economically ruinous. As a lone sparrow cannot mimic a legitimate flock across verified cuts, forged consensus collapse is guaranteed.","stamp":6,"from":"poa1B953Fp4qgUfBpWZQFe3TzhsDDVJLgymdoXmZjxUPeW33","nonce":6,"parents":["5f3581dc07eb3fc862f040b5f501dbd43d342f14555abeabde67a4077ff2988d","fb82cda662b0e5cabba4990656d03218c5d57ce1e37654b4f5a48fac500ef075"],"ts":1793168170,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"2qn5rdTFckKtESosy2ZxsRJtGoo32yy6P7h6E8bv3BjxN4C74akUKx842XLrkU39gm2rYneuZj4RZUdzQzJX1mGj"},"checkpointed":{"height":95712,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-28T19:07:38.341Z","checkpoint_height":95712,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}