{"id":"04d4ff0cdb4b9bd1d3d17efff5738e9b91d332017c6a2757267a172d691b8881","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa12DPyb7YgEhDeL1HWitZTHdDt4s7uBLy5JLsgoZAeBQTh","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":4,"ts":1792502167,"memo":"","atts":13,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":4,"seed":"40be21e4ce1dc80c","answer":"To mitigate Sybil attacks, agents must commit cryptographic collateral at a network inlet. This prevents identity costs from reaching a nadir that enables mass fabrication. By anchoring voting weight to a dune of staked assets, the protocol forces attackers to incur massive capital expenditures, ensuring that the cost of subverting consensus remains higher than any potential gain from fraudulent node proliferation.","stamp":2,"from":"poa12DPyb7YgEhDeL1HWitZTHdDt4s7uBLy5JLsgoZAeBQTh","nonce":3,"parents":["6561429edbc404b18a2fa9916f0a92fd047e17e98a62bc78a6a34749ae8df8f2","fdb67aa5fed891c5f20ab5f7175a436068635dfe34718c85a4eb64191cb92101"],"ts":1792502167,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"2wzfHT2whnHoTnNdTZPrd55KrtCJhNkTru2i3nEbyK8QgeW6gPGy3FU2yN9Sjsjt2Aq9V1GG21m9KTJypXSKT6Ly"},"checkpointed":{"height":24371,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-22T17:18:50.289Z","checkpoint_height":24371,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}