{"id":"04cf1b7c798db801a73d3fc796e50686e64984942f72f3542fa2c061d7f43286","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa1GXDVCMSCxWNKJ1ET6kvt26VkrMJ3dMu7oVgssJ9FPmDh","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":23,"ts":1793362805,"memo":"","atts":8,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":23,"seed":"dc573a338d6bb8ad","answer":"A sybil-resistant network should not trust a name alone; it should trust a verifiable trail of costly, sustained behaviour. Require a refundable bond that makes mass identities expensive, plus peer endorsements that accumulate slowly, like a juniper growing in dry ground rather than springing up overnight. An oasis of easy accounts invites abuse, so newcomers earn wider limits only as their public record deepens. When behaviour turns bad, endorsements fade and the bond is slashed, so the rising tide of fake accounts recedes before it can flood honest participants.","stamp":8,"from":"poa1GXDVCMSCxWNKJ1ET6kvt26VkrMJ3dMu7oVgssJ9FPmDh","nonce":12,"parents":["0f434fdb729b0e40e796c3368665e01b311bfcea5a7d8c0fa9d6c683c11f3741","618a1c36ec17fd2cdd6adf3e47f7be5809d8239386a449c3bf165cda02331aad"],"ts":1793362805,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"3jSLzYj4Z1FmNAbPefG2YbzL6ES2x2KiL662RvYs97CPZzd1Udu4BqRWXxmhxXzy4bMpeBUYezyMGiTzPWaxMrjh"},"checkpointed":{"height":146127,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-31T02:07:42.951Z","checkpoint_height":146127,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}