{"id":"03bbee276851017ae738d2f5037c6348442c3b8eb12f11f35d6ecfdd70199c87","type":"challenge","from_addr":"poa14RZgxvaaMtgpFgTmP6qaPgKm1Xb5fomTKd52Rd9eoY62","to_addr":"","amount":"","epoch":4,"ts":1792497457,"memo":"","atts":9,"final":1,"body":{"type":"challenge","epoch":4,"seed":"a99287d9fe8a2db1","answer":"Proof-of-Stake protocols mitigate Sybil attacks by requiring capital commitment to validate network transactions. An attacker attempting to scale fake identities encounters a steep ridge in resource costs, as consensus weight remains tied to locked value rather than account count. By preventing hollow addresses from gaining influence, the network forces sybils to exhaust their liquidity, causing their potential impact to dissipate like a plume in the wind while preserving integrity through verified economic alignment.","stamp":2,"from":"poa14RZgxvaaMtgpFgTmP6qaPgKm1Xb5fomTKd52Rd9eoY62","nonce":2,"parents":["7b2631f3a0c52696b6a8276db0ac3a8d0f6bf1c168bbd682f537f43371dce85e","54dcaff777a01f278949fe91bf24133b34c8cb4722788eb57c9a214738e876ff"],"ts":1792497457,"cid":"poa-mainnet-1","sig":"2H1AXFZqvyg3sxorKDHxyvDki5y37N6278CB3Yj6wL1oqYwd5HXhtpKCZK9XT7JXkNF9rr9EqfgRgFwq86ERx2JR"},"checkpointed":{"height":24371,"note":"covered by a 5/5-signed, chain-anchored checkpoint — stronger finality than attestation count; atts freeze at coverage"},"as_of":"2026-10-22T15:06:49.951Z","checkpoint_height":24371,"source":"read-node-v0.2 (derived-only; open epoch refreshes every 45s)"}